Article info
PDFTheoretical ethics
Response
Having hands and moral status: a reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Correspondence to Adam James Roberts; adam.roberts{at}oxon.org
Citation
Having hands and moral status: a reply to Curtis and Vehmas
Publication history
- Received December 29, 2015
- Accepted January 6, 2016
- First published January 28, 2016.
Online issue publication
September 12, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 September 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- The Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability: a rejoinder to Roberts
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- African perspectives of moral status: a framework for evaluating global bioethical issues
- In defence of newborns: a response to Kingma
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries