Article info
PDFPolitical philosophy & medical ethics
Paper
Challenging the principle of proportionality
- Correspondence to Dr Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, The University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, Bergen 5020, Norway; Anna-Karin.Andersson{at}igs.uib.no
Citation
Challenging the principle of proportionality
Publication history
- Received July 31, 2015
- Revised November 23, 2015
- Accepted January 15, 2016
- First published February 2, 2016.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Congenitally decorticate children’s potential and rights
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan