Article Text
Abstract
Background Surrogates frequently are unable to predict which treatment their charges would want and also can experience significant distress as a result of making treatment decisions. A new method, the patient preference predictor (PPP), has been proposed as a possible way to supplement the process of shared decision-making to address these two concerns. The PPP predicts which treatment the patient would want based on which treatment similar patients want in similar circumstances. The present article describes the results of the first evaluation to assess whether patients support the use of a PPP.
Methods Self-administered survey of patients at a tertiary care centre.
Results Overall, 1169 respondents completed the survey (response rate=59.8%). In the event that the respondent became unable to make decisions due to a car accident, 78.9% would want the PPP to be incorporated into the process of making treatment decisions for them. In contrast, 15.2% of respondents would not want the PPP to be used for them. Respondents who endorsed the PPP cited the possibility that its use could increase the chances that they receive the treatments they prefer and/or reduce the burdens on their surrogate decision-maker.
Conclusions The majority of respondents endorsed the possibility of incorporating a PPP into the process of shared decision-making based on its potential to increase surrogates’ predictive accuracy and/or reduce surrogate distress. These data provide strong patient support for further research to assess whether, in practice, the use of a PPP can increase the chances that incapacitated patients receive the treatments they prefer and reduce the burden of making decisions on their surrogates.
- Aged
- Autonomy
- Clinical Ethics
- Decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision-making
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
- Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Experiences and perspectives related to shared decision-making among outpatients with degenerative joint disease in Taiwan: a qualitative study
- What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
- Exploring healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology
- Patient and physician perspectives guiding intra-articular treatment choice in knee osteoarthritis: stakeholders are aligned on treatment priorities but have different assessments of treatment effect
- Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice