As a medical student, I observed that different physicians had strikingly different attitudes and approaches when caring for patients. The care of one patient in particular continues to challenge my understanding of illness and moral responsibility in the practice of medicine. In this paper, I illustrate the care of this patient in order to evaluate the dominant ethics I was taught in medical school, in theory and in practice, and argue neither principlism nor the ethics of care fully captures the moral responsibility of physicians. Emphasising fidelity to the healing relationship, a core principle derived from Pellegrino's virtue theory, I conclude that this approach to clinical ethics fully explains physician responsibility. Pellegrino deconstructs the practice of medicine to clarify the moral event within the clinical encounter and offers a sufficiently useful and justified approach to patient care.
- Clinical Ethics
- Philosophy of Medicine
- Education for Health Care Professionals
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Professional-patient relationships and informed consent
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Knowing-how to care
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- The virtues (and vices) of the four principles
- Different approach to medical decision-making in difficult circumstances: Kittay’s Ethics of Care
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Why not common morality?
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- NHS constitution values for values-based recruitment: a virtue ethics perspective