Responses
Current controversy
Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 8 May 2015
- Published on: 8 May 2015PLR - better to boost PPIShow More
The Article states "In health research, funding bodies and academic institutions actively undertake patient and public involvement programmes to ensure that studies adequately reflect the perspectives and input of patients and citizens." I do not agree.
I have been a member of a research ethics committeee in England for seven years. I do not recognise this statement, nor would my colleagues. In very few cases...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low - and middle - income countries
- Is the NHS research ethics committees system to be outsourced to a low - cost offshore call centre? Reflections on human research ethics after the Warner Report
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Do researchers know what they are doing
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe
- Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
- Creating a ‘ FatherConfessor ’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part II, origins and organisation
- Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical - research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project
- Creating a ‘ FatherConfessor ’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes