Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by D. Hunter
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter Follow David Hunter at @idmonfish
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants
- Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by Hunter
- Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- Introducing patient and public involvement practices to healthcare research in Austria: strategies to promote change at multiple levels
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees