Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Understanding (and) consent: a response to MacKay
- Correspondence to Dr Ben Saunders, Department of Politics and IR, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; b.m.saunders{at}soton.ac.uk
Citation
Understanding (and) consent: a response to MacKay
Publication history
- Received June 3, 2015
- Revised September 15, 2015
- Accepted October 16, 2015
- First published November 11, 2015.
Online issue publication
December 19, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 December 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Healthcare students support opt-out organ donation for practical and moral reasons
- Tacitly consenting to donate one's organs
- Opt-out and consent
- Factors influencing deceased organ donation rates in OECD countries: a panel data analysis
- Normative consent and opt-out organ donation
- Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
- The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK
- Opt-out paradigms for deceased organ donation are ethically incoherent
- A public opinion survey: is presumed consent the answer to kidney shortage in Hong Kong?
- Opt-out organ procurement and tacit consent