Article Text
Abstract
Arora and Jacobs (2016) assume that liberal societies should tolerate non-therapeutic infant male circumcision, and argue that it follows from this that they should similarly tolerate—or even encourage—what the authors regard as ‘de minimis’ forms of female genital mutilation (as defined by the World Health Organization). In this commentary, I argue that many serious problems would be likely to follow from a policy of increased tolerance for female genital mutilation, and that it may therefore be time to consider a less tolerant attitude toward non-therapeutic infant male circumcision. Ultimately, I suggest that children of whatever sex or gender should be free from having healthy parts of their most intimate sexual organs either damaged or removed, before they can understand what is at stake in such an intervention and agree to it themselves.
- Circumcision
- Autonomy
- Children
- Feminism
- Sexuality/Gender
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
- Data supplement 1 - Online appendix
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Feature article
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘ health benefits ’ are morally irrelevant
- Female genital cutting in Malaysia: a mixed - methods study
- Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom — critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Female genital mutilation: the law as it relates to children
- Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe 's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision