Article info
Feature article
Commentary
Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ ‘Female genital alteration: a compromise solution’
- Correspondence to Dr Arianne Shahvisi, Department of Ethics, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University Of Sussex, Medical School, Biology Road Falmer, EAST SUSSEX, Brighton BN1 9PX, UK; A.Shahvisi{at}bsms.ac.uk
Citation
Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ ‘Female genital alteration: a compromise solution’
Publication history
- Received November 25, 2015
- Accepted December 3, 2015
- First published February 22, 2016.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief
- Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision