Article Text
Abstract
Despite 30 years of advocacy, the prevalence of non-therapeutic female genital alteration (FGA) in minors is stable in many countries. Educational efforts have minimally changed the prevalence of this procedure in regions where it has been widely practiced. In order to better protect female children from the serious and long-term harms of some types of non-therapeutic FGA, we must adopt a more nuanced position that acknowledges a wide spectrum of procedures that alter female genitalia. We offer a revised categorisation for non-therapeutic FGA that groups procedures by effect and not by process. Acceptance of de minimis procedures that generally do not carry long-term medical risks is culturally sensitive, does not discriminate on the basis of gender, and does not violate human rights. More morbid procedures should not be performed. However, accepting de minimis non-therapeutic f FGA procedures enhances the effort of compassionate practitioners searching for a compromise position that respects cultural differences but protects the health of their patients.
- Circumcision
- Sexuality/Gender
- Newborns and Minors
- Surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Supplementary materials
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Feature article
- Feature article
- The concise argument
- Commentary
Other content recommended for you
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘ health benefits ’ are morally irrelevant
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- Female genital cutting in Malaysia: a mixed - methods study
- Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified
- Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study
- Female genital mutilation: the law as it relates to children
- Female genital mutilation: the role of health professionals in prevention, assessment, and management
- Thirty - year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries
- Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries
- Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs ’ ‘ Female genital alteration: a compromise solution ’