Article info
PDFFeature article
Paper
Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Correspondence to Dr Kavita Shah Arora, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, G230E, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA; Kavita.shah.arora{at}gmail.com
Citation
Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
Publication history
- Received July 17, 2014
- Revised February 24, 2015
- Accepted July 21, 2015
- First published February 22, 2016.
Online issue publication
August 24, 2016
Press release
Files in this Data Supplement:
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Female genital mutilation: making the case for good practice
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Female genital mutilation: what every paediatrician should know
- Female genital mutilation in children presenting to a London safeguarding clinic: a case series
- Medicalisation of female genital mutilation is a dangerous development
- Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries