Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

JME Commentaries
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Table of contents

March 2016 - Volume 42 - 3

Journal of Medical Ethics: 42 (3)

The concise argument

Highlights from this issue (25 February, 2016) Free
Russell Powell

Editorial

Female genital mutilation: multiple practices, multiple wrongs (22 February, 2016)
Michael Dunn

Feature articles

Paper: Female genital alteration: a compromise solution (22 February, 2016) Free
Kavita Shah Arora, Allan J Jacobs
Commentary: Not all cultural traditions deserve respect (22 February, 2016) Free
Ruth Macklin
Commentary: Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ ‘Female genital alteration: a compromise solution’ (22 February, 2016) Free
Arianne Shahvisi
Commentary: In defence of genital autonomy for children (20 January, 2016) Free
Brian D Earp
Response: Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries (22 February, 2016) Free
Kavita Shah Arora, Allan Joel Jacobs

Current controversy

Should junior doctors strike? (12 January, 2016)
Mark Toynbee, Adam AJ Al-Diwani, Joe Clacey, Matthew R Broome
Commentary: Accreditation rules safeguard continuing medical education from commercial influence (8 October, 2015)
Graham T McMahon
Commentary: CME stands for commercial medical education: and ACCME still won't address the issue (16 December, 2015)
Adriane Fugh-Berman, Alycia Hogenmiller

Genetics

Paper: ‘Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.’ Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine (7 January, 2016)
Sandi Dheensa, Angela Fenwick, Anneke Lucassen

Law, ethics and medicine

Paper: The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists (30 November, 2015)
David Cape, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Alexis F Turgeon, Andrew Seely, Richard Hall, Karen Burns, Rohit K Singal, Peter Dodek, Sean Bagshaw, Robert Sibbald, James Downar

Research ethics

What is the role of ethics committees after Regulation (EU) 536/2014? (7 December, 2015)
Carlo Petrini
Ambiguous articles in new EU Regulation may lead to exploitation of vulnerable research subjects (4 January, 2016)
Anna Eva Westra
Paper: The EU Clinical Trials Regulation: key priorities, purposes and aims and the implications for public health (1 February, 2016)
Mark L Flear
Authorship policies of scientific journals (29 December, 2015)
David B Resnik, Ana M Tyler, Jennifer R Black, Grace Kissling
Response: Understanding (and) consent: a response to MacKay (11 November, 2015)
Ben Saunders
Response: Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by Hunter (30 December, 2015)
Joan Kirkbride, Catherine Blewett, Jennifer Martin
Response: Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by D. Hunter (29 January, 2016)
David Hunter

Issue Information