Article Text
Reproductive ethics
Commentary
Might a conscience clause be used for non-moral or prejudiced reasons?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- The fox and the grapes: an Anglo-Irish perspective on conscientious objection to the supply of emergency hormonal contraception without prescription
- Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment