Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- Correspondence to Dr Christopher Cowley, School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; Christopher.cowley{at}ucd.ie
Citation
Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
Publication history
- Received January 26, 2015
- Revised March 7, 2015
- Accepted April 2, 2015
- First published April 17, 2015.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 April 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Utilisation of second - trimester spontaneous and induced abortion services in public hospitals in Mexico, 2007–2015
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Barriers and facilitators of access to first - trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review
- Toward accommodating physicians ’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- The place for individual conscience
- Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion