Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- Correspondence to Dr Christopher Cowley, School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; Christopher.cowley{at}ucd.ie
Citation
Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
Publication history
- Received January 26, 2015
- Revised March 7, 2015
- Accepted April 2, 2015
- First published April 17, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- After 50 years of legal abortion in Great Britain, calls grow for further liberalisation
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- War of conscience: antivaccination and the battle for medical freedom during World War I
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine