Law, ethics and medicine
Harm: as indeterminate as ‘best interests’, but useful for triage
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making
- Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
- If you ask the wrong question, you'll get the wrong answer
- Consent and capacity in children and young people
- The harm threshold and parents’ obligation to benefit their children
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice