Article Text
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Commentary
Harm: as indeterminate as ‘best interests’, but useful for triage
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision - making
- Harm is n't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- The harm threshold and parents ’ obligation to benefit their children
- Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment
- Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Overriding parents ’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- Why do we treat the children of Jehovah 's Witnesses differently from their adult parents