Article Text
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Commentary
Harm: as indeterminate as ‘best interests’, but useful for triage
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making
- Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
- If you ask the wrong question, you'll get the wrong answer
- Consent and capacity in children and young people
- The harm threshold and parents’ obligation to benefit their children
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice