Article Text
PDFClinical ethics
Commentary
The ethics of non-consensual HIV testing are not substantively different from the ethics of overriding the right not to know a test result
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
- Clinical ethics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- HIV and the right not to know: a reply to replies
- HIV and the right not to know
- Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on medical law
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Human rights and ethical considerations for a tobacco-free generation
- The case of biobank with the law: between a legal and scientific fiction
- The Human Rights Act 1998 and medical treatment: time for re-examination
- Patient autonomy in an East-Asian cultural milieu: a critique of the individualism-collectivism model
- Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
- Identity, personhood and the law: a response to Ashcroft and McGee