Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Commentary
HIV status: the prima facie right not to know the result
- Correspondence to Dr Tak Kwong Chan, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; theo{at}hku.hk
Citation
HIV status: the prima facie right not to know the result
Publication history
- Received November 9, 2015
- Accepted December 21, 2015
- First published January 25, 2016.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- HIV and the right not to know
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- HIV and the right not to know: a reply to replies
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- When four principles are too many: a commentary
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- HIV exceptionalism, CD4+ cell testing, and conscientious subversion
- Human rights and ethical considerations for a tobacco-free generation