Article info
Commentary
Defining and evaluating overdiagnosis
- Correspondence to Dr Bjørn Hofmann, University of Oslo, Centre for Medical Ethics, P. O. Box 1130, Blindern, Oslo N0318, Norway; b.m.hofmann{at}medisin.uio.no
Citation
Defining and evaluating overdiagnosis
Publication history
- Received June 21, 2016
- Accepted July 23, 2016
- First published August 16, 2016.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 August 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- A definition and ethical evaluation of overdiagnosis
- A definition and ethical evaluation of overdiagnosis: response to commentaries
- Casting the net too wide on overdiagnosis: benefits, burdens and non-harmful disease
- Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
- Walking the tightrope: communicating overdiagnosis in modern healthcare
- Overdiagnosis in primary care: framing the problem and finding solutions
- Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study
- Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study
- The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey