Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
A framework for assessing the ethics of doctors' strikes
- Correspondence to Adam James Roberts, adam.roberts{at}oxon.org
Citation
A framework for assessing the ethics of doctors' strikes
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2016
- Revised April 5, 2016
- Accepted April 18, 2016
- First published May 20, 2016.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 May 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Should junior doctors strike?
- Should Doctors strike?
- What are the consequences when doctors strike?
- Retrospective analysis of the national impact of industrial action by English junior doctors in 2016
- Just Wars and doctors' strikes
- Industrial action: What’s the current state of play for consultants, junior doctors, and GPs?
- Impact of healthcare strikes on patient mortality: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Doctors’ pay award: what have different groups been offered, and is industrial action “inevitable”?
- Overwhelming majority of junior doctors vote for strike action
- “We are solid”—pay award unites profession in appetite for industrial action