Article Text
Abstract
The first aim of this article is to offer a framework for constructive and rigorous discussions of the ethics of doctors' strikes, beginning with an in-principle distinction between the questions of how one should conduct oneself while working as a doctor and when and how one can suspend that work. The second is to explore how that framework applies to the contemporary British case of strikes by English junior doctors, with my suggestion being that those strikes do meet all of the criteria proposed. In closing, I gesture towards a further ethical dimension to strikes which is too often overlooked: namely, the responsibilities of employers and others not to misrepresent or demonise those doctors who are engaged in or considering taking industrial action.
- Applied and Professional Ethics
- Interests of Health Personnel/Institutions
- Journalism/Mass media
- Philosophy of the Health Professions
- Political Philosophy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should junior doctors strike?
- Should Doctors strike?
- Revisiting the comparison between healthcare strikes and just war
- What are the consequences when doctors strike?
- Retrospective analysis of the national impact of industrial action by English junior doctors in 2016
- UK doctors’ strikes 2023: not only justified but, arguably, supererogatory
- Strike escalation and seasonal pressures create perfect storm for the NHS
- Just Wars and doctors' strikes
- Hospital leaders warned that failure to recall striking doctors risked patient safety in some trusts, documents show
- Junior doctors’ strikes: it’s time to stop the walkouts and start negotiations