Article Text
Extended essay
Response
Parsing placebo treatments: a response to Barnhill and Miller
Abstract
Anne Barnhill and Franklin Miller dispute my claim that the prescriptions of placebo treatments to patients are not typically deceptive, and do not typically violate the patients' informed consent. However, Barnhill and Miller seriously mischaracterise my position in two ways, as well as failing to show that the procedure I discuss requires a physician to act wrongfully in deceiving her patient. Accordingly, I find their argument unpersuasive.
- Informed Consent
- Applied and Professional Ethics
- Truth Disclosure
- Ethics
- Paternalism
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of placebo treatments in clinical practice: a reply to Glackin
- Placebo treatments, informed consent and ‘the grip of a false picture’
- Deception, intention and clinical practice
- Ethics of placebo use in clinical practice: why we need to look beyond deontology
- The moral case for the clinical placebo
- Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials
- Cyclooxygenase 2—implications on maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity and ulcer healing: controversial issues and perspectives
- Pretending to care
- Variability in the Response to Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
- Controversies and advances in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) analgesia in chronic pain management