Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
- Correspondence to Professor Christopher Kaczor, James Madison Program, Princeton University, 83 Prospect Avenue, Princeton, NJ 08540-5210, USA; kaczor{at}princeton.edu
Citation
Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
Publication history
- Received May 27, 2015
- Revised September 3, 2015
- Accepted September 30, 2015
- First published October 16, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?
- The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?
- Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing
- On Dying Well: An Anglican Contribution to the Debate on Euthanasia
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation