Article Text
Research ethics
Response
Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
Abstract
If we accept euthanasia for adults, should we also accept voluntary euthanasia for children? In ‘Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk about It?’, Luc Bovens answers this question affirmatively. Bovens examines five arguments against extending euthanasia to minors, the arguments being weightiness, capability of discernment, pressure, sensitivity and sufficient palliative care. He rejects each of these arguments. In this paper, I provide a rejoinder for each of his responses. I also critique his view that opponents of euthanasia have extra responsibility to promote palliative care. On the contrary, if euthanasia is legalised, advocates of euthanasia have a special obligation to promote improvements in palliative care.
- Euthanasia
- Palliative Care
- Children
- Informed Consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?
- The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?
- Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing
- On Dying Well: An Anglican Contribution to the Debate on Euthanasia
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation