Article Text
Reproductive ethics
Paper
A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
Abstract
This paper is about the moral status of those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities (PIDs). We hold the common sense view that they have equal status to ‘normal’ human beings, and a higher status than any non-human animal. On the standard account of moral status, this view cannot be sustained. In this paper, we ask whether, in order to be justified in continuing to hold our view, we are obliged to offer an alternative account that does sustain it? Our answer is that we are not.
- Moral Status
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
- Reproductive ethics
- Theoretical ethics
- Correction
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Pregnancy and superior moral status: a proposal for two thresholds of personhood
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: a reply to Miller
- Highlights from this issue
- Devoured by our own children: the possibility and peril of moral status enhancement