Article Text
Abstract
In conceptual debates on addiction, neurobiological research has been used to support the idea that addicted drug users lack control over their addiction-related actions. In some interpretations, this has led to coercive treatment models, in which, the purpose is to ‘restore’ control. However, neurobiological studies that go beyond what is typically presented in conceptual debates paint a different story. In particular, they indicate that though addiction has neurobiological manifestations that make the addictive behaviour difficult to control, it is possible for individuals to reverse these manifestations through their own efforts. Thus, addicted individuals should not be considered incapable of making choices voluntarily, simply on the basis that addiction has neurobiological manifestations, and coercive treatment models of addiction should be reconsidered in this respect.
- Substance Abusers/Users of Controlled Substances
- Autonomy
- Coercion
- Competence/incompetence
- Decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Parkinson disease and impulse control disorders: a review of clinical features, pathophysiology and management
- Neuropsychiatry of the basal ganglia
- Subjective assessments of research domain criteria constructs in addiction and compulsive disorders: a scoping review protocol
- Extrastriatal dopaminergic changes in Parkinson’s disease patients with impulse control disorders
- Research progress and debates on gaming disorder
- Expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of substance use and addictive behaviour-related disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Case for raising the minimum legal age of tobacco sale to 25
- Intellectual disability complicated by sexual addiction: an uncommon presentation of a common condition
- Psychostimulant effect of levodopa: reversing sensitisation is possible
- Clinical-genetic model predicts incident impulse control disorders in Parkinson's disease