Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The role of emotion in ethics and bioethics: dealing with repugnance and disgust
Citation
The role of emotion in ethics and bioethics: dealing with repugnance and disgust
Publication history
- First published December 15, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- United Nations fails to agree on human cloning
- Illegal beings. Human cloning and the law
- Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers
- Sinning against nature: the theory of background conditions
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle