Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The role of emotion in ethics and bioethics: dealing with repugnance and disgust
Citation
The role of emotion in ethics and bioethics: dealing with repugnance and disgust
Publication history
- First published December 15, 2015.
Online issue publication
December 15, 2015
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances
- Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- A resource - based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans
- Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics
- Ban on human reproductive cloning demanded