Article Text
Abstract
Decision-making capacity (DMC) evaluations are complex clinical judgements with important ethical implications for patients’ self-determination. They are achieved not only on descriptive grounds but are inherently normative and, therefore, dependent on the values held by those involved in the DMC evaluation. To date, the issue of whether and how physicians’ personal values relate to DMC evaluation has never been empirically investigated. The present survey study aimed to investigate this question by exploring the relationship between physicians’ value profiles and the use of risk-relative standards in capacity evaluations. The findings indicate that physicians’ personal values are of some significance in this regard. Those physicians with relatively high scores on the value types of achievement, power-resource, face and conformity to interpersonal standards were more likely to apply risk-relative criteria in a range of situations, using more stringent assessment standards when interventions were riskier. By contrast, those physicians who strongly emphasise hedonism, conformity to rules and universalism concern were more likely to apply equal standards regardless of the consequences of a decision. Furthermore, it has been shown that around a quarter of all respondents do not appreciate that their values impact on their DMC evaluations, highlighting a need to better sensitise physicians in this regard. The implications of these findings are discussed, especially in terms of the moral status of the potential and almost unavoidable influence of physicians’ values.
- Autonomy
- Capacity
- Ethics
- Informed Consent
- Paternalism
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- When psychiatry and bioethics disagree about patient decision making capacity (DMC)
- Personal values and cancer treatment refusal
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Overriding parents ’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature
- The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research
- Physicians ’ evaluations of patients ’ decisions to refuse oncological treatment
- How is informed consent related to emotions and empathy? An exploratory neuroethical investigation
- Mental incapacity and restraint for treatment: present law and proposals for reform
- Attitudes and practices of physicians regarding physician - assisted dying in minors
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward