Article info
PDFCommentary
Patients, doctors and the good life (for the patient)
- Correspondence to Professor Daniel Brudney, Department of Philosophy, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Chicago, Illinois, USA; dbrudney{at}uchicago.edu
Citation
Patients, doctors and the good life (for the patient)
Publication history
- Received February 9, 2015
- Accepted February 18, 2015
- First published March 13, 2015.
Online issue publication
August 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 March 2015).
- Previous version (16 June 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Clinical issues on consent: some philosophical concerns
- Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists’ professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives
- Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent