Article info
PDFCommentary
On substituted arguments
- Correspondence to Dr Daniel P Sulmasy, The Department of Medicine and Divinity School, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; dsulmasy{at}bsd.uchicago.edu
Citation
On substituted arguments
Publication history
- Received December 4, 2014
- Accepted January 16, 2015
- First published February 11, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Spiritual conversation model for patients and loved ones in palliative care: a validation study
- An observational, longitudinal study on the home environment of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the research protocol of the Home Sweet Home study
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care
- Cluster-randomised trial of a nurse-led advance care planning session in patients with COPD and their loved ones
- Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision-making
- Making consequentialism more appealing