Article info
PDFCommentary
Substituted judgment in real life
- Correspondence to Professor Rebecca Dresser, Department of Law, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA; dresser{at}wulaw.wustl.edu
Citation
Substituted judgment in real life
Publication history
- Received October 1, 2014
- Accepted October 17, 2014
- First published November 6, 2014.
Online issue publication
August 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 November 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision - making
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy - making
- How do clinicians prepare family members for the role of surrogate decision - maker
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide
- Whose decision? Whose practice
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward