Article info
PDFFeature article
Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Correspondence to Dr David Wendler, Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; dwendler{at}nih.gov
Citation
Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
Publication history
- Received September 25, 2013
- Revised September 3, 2014
- Accepted September 23, 2014
- First published October 30, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes: how do physicians and nurses describe and justify their own practice?
- Proposal to support making decisions about the organ donation process
- ‘Doctor, what would you do in my position?’ Health professionals and the decision-making process in pregnancy monitoring
- Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision-making
- Communicating with relatives
- “Please, I want to go home”: ethical issues raised when considering choice of place of care in palliative care
- A case study from the perspective of medical ethics: refusal of treatment in an ambulance
- Why I decided to provide assisted dying: it is truly patient centred care