Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Commentary
Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Clarifying best interests
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- ‘Mrs A’: a controversial or extreme case?