Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Commentary
Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Correspondence to Karin Rolanda Jongsma, Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Office NA 21.17, PO box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands; k.jongsma{at}erasmusmc.nl
Citation
Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
Publication history
- Received August 21, 2014
- Accepted September 4, 2014
- First published September 19, 2014.
Online issue publication
July 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 September 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Response to commentaries by Karin Rolanda Jongsma and Suzanne van de Vathorst, and Oliver Hallich
- ‘Mrs A’: a controversial or extreme case?
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients