Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Correspondence to Dr Tom Buller, Department of Philosophy, Illinois State University, 412 Stevenson Hall, Campus Box 4540, Normal, IL 61790-4540, USA; tgbulle{at}ilstu.edu
Citation
Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
Publication history
- Received January 6, 2014
- Revised May 17, 2014
- Accepted July 29, 2014
- First published August 12, 2014.
Online issue publication
July 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 August 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M
- Clarifying best interests
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?