Article Text
Abstract
Routine neonatal circumcision—the non-therapeutic circumcision of infant males—has generated considerable ethical controversy. In this article, I suggest that much of the disagreement results from conflicting ideas about the autonomy of the child. I examine two questions about autonomy. First, I ask whether we should be realists or idealists about the future autonomous choices of the child—that is, whether we should account for the fact that the child may not make the best choices in future, or whether we should assume that his future choices will reflect his best interests. Second, I ask whether the child has a right to autonomy with respect to circumcision, an interest in autonomy or neither—that is, whether respect for autonomy overrides considerations of interests, whether it counts as one interest among many or whether it counts for nothing. In response to the first question, I argue that we should be idealists when evaluating the child's own interests, but realists when evaluating public health justifications for circumcision. In response to the second question, I argue that the child has an interest in deciding whether or not to be circumcised, insofar as the decision is more likely to reflect his actual interests and his own values. Finally, I show how these findings may help to resolve some particular disputes over the ethics of infant male circumcision.
- Circumcision
- Autonomy
- Children
- Public Health Ethics
- Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe 's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- The child 's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Impact of text and email messaging on the sexual health of young people: a randomised controlled trial
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- On the impermissibility of infant male circumcision: a response to Mazor (2013)
- Low effectiveness of syndromic treatment services for curable sexually transmitted infections in rural South Africa
- Does sexually transmitted infection always mean sexual abuse in young children
- The historical role and education of nurses for the care and management of sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom: 2 Education and training