Article Text
End of life
Misconstrual of EAPC's position paper on euthanasia
Abstract
This is a response to Barutta and Vollmann's article ‘Physician-assisted death with limited access to palliative care.’ I show how they misconstrue a key empirical statement made by the European Association for Palliative Care regarding legalisation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Additionally, I include some further remarks on the relationship between euthanasia and palliative care. I read with interest the article, which delineate well several positions and gives a nice overview of arguments presented on either side. I also found the line of argument unprejudiced and clear, and am sure people working within palliative care would benefit from reading it.
- Euthanasia
- Palliative Care
- Ethics
- End of Life Care
- End-of-life
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- End of life
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Physician-assisted death with limited access to palliative care
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Palliative care and euthanasia: what is the view of the EAPC?
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?
- Euthanasia embedded in palliative care. Responses to essentialistic criticisms of the Belgian model of integral end-of-life care
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Does legal physician-assisted dying impede development of palliative care? The Belgian and Benelux experience
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven