Article info
PDFEnd of life
Paper
Ethics and end of life care: the Liverpool Care Pathway and the Neuberger Review
- Correspondence to Dr Anthony Wrigley, Centre for Professional Ethics (PEAK), School of Law, Chancellor's Building, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; a.wrigley{at}keele.ac.uk
Citation
Ethics and end of life care: the Liverpool Care Pathway and the Neuberger Review
Publication history
- Received August 19, 2013
- Revised December 16, 2013
- Accepted March 26, 2014
- First published May 21, 2014.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- ‘It doesn't do the care for you': a qualitative study of health care professionals' perceptions of the benefits and harms of integrated care pathways for end of life care
- Factors affecting the successful implementation and sustainability of the Liverpool Care Pathway for dying patients: a realist evaluation
- Care of the dying patient in the community
- Liverpool Care Pathway: life-ending pathway or palliative care pathway?
- Demise of the LCP: villain or scapegoat?
- Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups
- Hydration and symptoms in the last days of life
- Assessing the uptake of the Liverpool Care Pathway for dying patients: a systematic review
- The birth and death of the Liverpool care pathway
- End of life care in the acute hospital setting