Article Text
Abstract
This article explores the role of the physician in the Assisted Dying Bill, which is currently progressing through the House of Lords. The Supreme Court decision in Nicklinson and Others has alerted Parliament to the possibility that the current prohibition against assisted suicide may breach Article 8 of the European Convention in relation to the right to choose how to end one's life. In this article, the role of healthcare professionals in the proposed legalisation of physician-assisted suicide is examined, together with consideration of key ethical concerns over who might be permitted to access assisted dying. Whether the proposed law presents an ethically sound alternative to the current prohibition against assisting in suicide is not clear, but Parliament must now respond in order to address human rights issues and the call to legalise medically assisted suicide.
- Conscientious Objection
- Autonomy
- Bills, Laws and Cases
- Death
- End-of-life
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted dying: the ongoing debate
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Changes in BMA policy on assisted dying
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Assisted dying and medical practice: questions and considerations for healthcare organisations
- Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- British community pharmacists' views of physician-assisted suicide (PAS)