Article Text
PDFEnd of life
Suicide tourism may change attitudes to assisted suicide, but not through the courts
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests CF appeared as counsel for ‘The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children’ in Purdy v DPP, and for ‘Care Not Killing’ in the Nicklinson/Lamb/Martin litigation.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
- End of life
- End of life
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Suicide tourism: a pilot study on the Swiss phenomenon
- A test for mental capacity to request assisted suicide
- Prosecutorial policy on encouraging and assisting suicide—how much clearer could it be?
- BMA guidance on assisted suicide violates human rights, barrister says
- High Court throws out “suicide aid” case
- Ethics briefings
- Doctors and assisted suicide
- Swiss parliament may try to ban “suicide tourism”
- New interim guidance on assisted suicide
- The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician