Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In their article ‘Suicide tourism: a pilot study on the Swiss phenomenon,’1 Gauthier et al claim that cases of suicide tourism identified in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, have ‘doubled' in recent years, that such assistance is uniquely available in Switzerland due to laxity in Swiss laws, and that the situation is problematic enough that the European Court of Human Rights ‘recently ruled that Switzerland has to issue regulations for prescribing lethal medication….’ These statements are wrong, misleading and inflammatory. To little surprise, the mass media readily lapped up on the hype-news of ‘doubling’.i The study by Gauthier and colleagues is riddled with methodological, analytical and reporting flaws which strip it of its credibility. What is the background and what are the flaws of the ‘study’ by Gauthier et al?
The method of data collection and analysis by Gauthier et al is not explicitly justified by the authors and leads to serious misrepresentations of the factual situation in Switzerland. The authors analysed only assisted suicides (AS) in which the Zürich Institute of Legal Medicine had been involved and only those that occurred between 2008 and 2012. Cases of non-Swiss residents in which other Institutes of Legal Medicine have been involvedii were not considered. The authors claim to have included 611 cases (‘all foreign residents who had been given assistance in suicide during the period 1 January 2008–31 December 2012’), but Dignitas alone assisted 632 non-Swiss residents during that period.2
Why did the ‘researchers’ choose the years 2008–2012? Had the authors included just two more years, 2006 and 2007, they would have found that the number of assisted suicides decreased from 2006 until 2009, and then increased until 2012 to reach the level of 2006.2 In consequence, the hype-claim of ‘doubling’ is relativised. All research …
Footnotes
Competing interests SL is an employee of DIGNITAS—To live with dignity—To die with dignity.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i As can be seen with a simple web search-machine, using the words “suicide+tourism+doubled”.
↵ii There are 7 such institutes in Switzerland. http://www.sgrm.ch/allgemein/institute.html (accessed 2 Oct 2014).
↵iii Also pointed out by the ECHR in the case Gross v. Switzerland, in paragraph 65.
↵iv The Swiss Criminal Code came into force on 1 Jan 1942.
↵v See “Forschung auf Abwegen” including a press file, etc. http://www.dignitas.ch/index.php?lang=de (accessed 2 Oct 2014).
Linked Articles
- End of life
- End of life
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Suicide tourism: a pilot study on the Swiss phenomenon
- Assisted suicide by oxygen deprivation with helium at a Swiss right-to-die organisation
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right-to-die organisations
- Swiss hospitals admit to allowing assisted suicide on their wards
- Suicide tourism may change attitudes to assisted suicide, but not through the courts
- Exploring the experiences of bereaved families involved in assisted suicide in Southern Switzerland: a qualitative study