End of life
Continuing or forgoing treatment at the end of life? Preferences of the general public and people with an advance directive
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- What do people want at the end of life, with or without an advance directive?
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Transfer of residents to hospital prior to cardiac death: the influence of nursing home quality and ownership type