Article Text
Abstract
The question of how disability should be defined is fraught with political, ethical and philosophical complexities. The social model of disability, which posits that disability is socially and politically constructed and is characterised by systemic barriers, has enjoyed broad acceptance that is exemplified by the slow but steady progress in securing civil rights for persons with disabilities. Yet, there remains a palpable tension between disability studies scholars and activists and bioethicists. While philosophers and bioethicists should heed the theories developed from the standpoint of persons with disabilities, disability activists should acknowledge the possibility that philosophical theories about the basic reality of disease, illness, health, function and impairment offer a more steady foundation for social or political critiques of disability. I argue that naturalistic theories of function and dysfunction provide a valuable starting point to clarify questions about the broader concept of disability. A naturalist theory of function may serve as the core of the concept of disability and provide disability scholars and bioethicists alike a stronger set of arguments in analysing real or potential instances of disability.
- Disability
- Ethics
- Philosophy of Medicine
- Concept of Health
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- Making space for disability studies within a structurally competent medical curriculum: reflections on long Covid
- Graphic illustration of impairment: science fiction, Transmetropolitan and the social model of disability
- Philosophy and science: the axes of evil in disability studies?
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Disability: getting it “right”
- Philosophy meets disability
- Debating disability
- Is there a coherent social conception of disability?
- Moving through capacity space: mapping disability and enhancement
- Exploring the intersection of critical disability studies, humanities and global health through a case study of scarf injuries in Bangladesh