Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Animal research through a lens: transparency on animal research
  1. J W Yeates1,
  2. B Reed1
  1. 1RSPCA, Southwater, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr J W Yeates, RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater RH13 9RS, UK; james.yeates{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Transparency involves communicating meaningful information (eg, data or details of decision-making processes) to audiences, openly and honestly, with the intention of informing, enabling understanding and meeting responsibilities of accountability.

The paper in this issue by Levin and Reppy1 highlights the value of transparency in improving ethical discussions on animal research, to allow the public (who fund much of the research) to properly evaluate the scientific and ethical case for any proposed use of animals in research or testing. A second paper by Goodman and colleagues2 points out that the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) currently does not provide certain information on animal use. At the same time, waning support for animal research has been documented.3 ,4

Partly stimulated by similar reports, Europe has seen a number of recent efforts aimed at improving transparency on animal research. Basel Declaration signatories undertake to ‘contribute to providing society with open and transparent information about animal experiments’,5 while those of the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK undertake to …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Julian Savulescu

Other content recommended for you