Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i NIH Curriculum Supplement Series – Exploring Bioethics: Grades 9–122 was developed in part by philosophers.
-
↵ii Kamm herself notes that the goal of promoting the best consequences can override the norms constitutive of being a scientist (p. 528).
-
↵iii For example, the commissioner might be against euthanasia if it involves killing, but be permissive if it involves merely letting someone die. If a philosopher were to claim that there is no morally relevant difference between killing and letting die, as support for permitting some acts of euthanasia that are killings, the commissioner might conclude instead that no cases of euthanasia are permissible (p. 528; see also pp. 529 and 532–533 for other examples).
-
↵iv Perhaps this idea is what Kamm is getting at in note 11, p. 546.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: precis
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Science fiction in bioethics: a role for feminist narratology
- Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity?
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees
- The formative years: medical ethics comes of age
- On the value of team medical staff: can the “Moneyball” approach be applied to injuries in professional football?