Article Text
Abstract
Innovative therapy is a matter of recent public interest, particularly following Lord Saatchi's Medical Innovation Bill. The purpose of the Bill is to encourage responsible innovation in medical treatment. We argue for the need to achieve a balance between the risks of medical innovation and patient safety considerations. We make the case for statutory regulation of medical innovation on the basis of responsible innovation, choice and patient-centred care. At the heart of regulation of medical innovation is care delivered by a process which is accountable, transparent and allows full consideration of all relevant matters. This paper proposes a two-stage test (to assess applicability of medical innovation as well as suitability for the choice of intervention to be undertaken). It is suggested that this model would provide safeguards for patients as well as define limits for doctors in the context of innovative therapy. Implementation and application of such therapy must be underpinned by due process and governance oversight, which could be provided through context-specific professional peer review. A combination of these ethicolegal principles would permit responsible medical innovation and maximise benefit in terms of therapy and patient-centred care.
- Decision-making
- Legal Aspects
- Negligence
- Clinical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Towards a bioethics of innovation
- The “Saatchi bill” is mistargeted and will put vulnerable patients at risk
- Why there is no legal or medical justification for the Saatchi bill
- The “Saatchi bill” will allow responsible innovation in treatment
- The deadly business of an unregulated global stem cell industry
- New bill aims to embolden doctors to practise innovative medicine
- Compassionate and innovative treatments in children: a proposal for an ethical framework
- Ethics briefings
- The use of multiple-criteria decision-making theory to measure students’ perceptions of high-fidelity simulation
- Can we learn from hidden mistakes? Self-fulfilling prophecy and responsible neuroprognostic innovation