Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Paper
The best argument against kidney sales fails
- Correspondence to Luke Semrau, Philosophy Department, 111 Furman Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA; Luke.semrau{at}gmail.com
Citation
The best argument against kidney sales fails
Publication history
- Received July 23, 2014
- Revised August 27, 2014
- Accepted September 7, 2014
- First published September 25, 2014.
Online issue publication
November 08, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Choice, pressure and markets in kidneys
- Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
- The ethics of biomedical markets
- Black markets, transplant kidneys and interpersonal coercion
- Understanding choice, pressure and markets in kidneys
- A legal market in organs: the problem of exploitation
- Organ markets and harms: a reply to Dworkin, Radcliffe Richards and Walsh
- Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Would you sell a kidney in a regulated kidney market? Results of an exploratory study