Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The ethics of creating human beings has been addressed in several contexts: debates over abortion and embryo research; literature on ‘self-creation’ and discussions of procreative rights and responsibilities, genetic engineering and future generations. This book is a sustained, scholarly analysis of all of these issues—a discussion that attempts to combine breadth of topics with philosophical depth, imagination with current scientific understanding and argumentative rigour with accessibility. The overarching aim of Creation Ethics is to illuminate a broad array of issues connected with reproduction and genetics through the lens of moral philosophy.1
Chapter 1 introduces the concept of creation and the various ways in which human beings create, or someday will create, humans beings and particular types of human beings. It also clarifies how the book differs from existing literature and provides an overview of the other chapters.
Chapter 2 addresses the moral status of the prenatal human being and the attendant ethical issues of abortion and embryo research. DeGrazia first defends a tripartite framework for understanding prenatal moral status: a biological view of our essence, a view of when we come into existence and a version of the time-relative interest account of the harm of death. The framework supports liberal views about abortion and embryo research. After rebutting the …
Footnotes
Disclaimer This work was supported, in part, by intramural funds from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. The views expressed are the author's own. They do not represent the position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, the US Public Health Service or the Department of Health and Human Services.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples
- The unwitting sacrifice problem
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research