Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Creation ethics: reproduction, genetics and quality of life
  1. David DeGrazia
  1. Correspondence to Dr David DeGrazia, Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Rm 1C118, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA; ddd{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The ethics of creating human beings has been addressed in several contexts: debates over abortion and embryo research; literature on ‘self-creation’ and discussions of procreative rights and responsibilities, genetic engineering and future generations. This book is a sustained, scholarly analysis of all of these issues—a discussion that attempts to combine breadth of topics with philosophical depth, imagination with current scientific understanding and argumentative rigour with accessibility. The overarching aim of Creation Ethics is to illuminate a broad array of issues connected with reproduction and genetics through the lens of moral philosophy.1

Chapter 1 introduces the concept of creation and the various ways in which human beings create, or someday will create, humans beings and particular types of human beings. It also clarifies how the book differs from existing literature and provides an overview of the other chapters.

Chapter 2 addresses the moral status of the prenatal human being and the attendant ethical issues of abortion and embryo research. DeGrazia first defends a tripartite framework for understanding prenatal moral status: a biological view of our essence, a view of when we come into existence and a version of the time-relative interest account of the harm of death. The framework supports liberal views about abortion and embryo research. After rebutting the …

View Full Text


  • Disclaimer This work was supported, in part, by intramural funds from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. The views expressed are the author's own. They do not represent the position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, the US Public Health Service or the Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Author meets critics: response
    David Benatar
  • Author meets critics: response
    Leslie Francis
  • Author meets critics: response
    Ingmar Persson
  • Author meets critics: response
    Sheelagh McGuinness
  • Author meets critics: response
    David DeGrazia