Law, ethics and medicine
Testing the limits of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment
We examine the likely reception in the courtroom of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic confidentiality. We conclude that the model, as modified by Gilbar and others, is workable and reflects, better than more conventional legal approaches, both the biological and psychological realities and the obligations owed under Articles 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
- Genetic Information
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information: a joint account?
- ‘Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.’ Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- The right not to know: the case of psychiatric disorders
- Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- Is there a duty to share genetic information?
- When to break the news and whose responsibility is it? A cross-sectional qualitative study of health professionals’ views regarding disclosure of BRCA genetic cancer risk
- The case of biobank with the law: between a legal and scientific fiction
- Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information