Article Text
Abstract
Introduction Most physicians are against active euthanasia. Very little is known about the possible changes in the attitudes of physicians.
Methods A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 1003 Finnish physicians of working age. A similar questionnaire had been sent to a random sample of Finnish physicians also in 1993 and 2003. The questionnaire consisted of statements about euthanasia, for which the participants were asked to express their agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale.
Results In general, Finnish physicians’ attitudes towards active euthanasia have become considerably more positive. In 2003, 61% of the respondents were against the legalisation of euthanasia and 29% supported it. In 2013, both groups were of equal size (46%). The willingness to perform active euthanasia has not, however, increased significantly, even in a legalised setting.
Conclusions The attitudes of Finnish physicians towards active euthanasia became considerably more positive between 2003 and 2013. There was no significant change, however, in the willingness to practice euthanasia if it became legal.
- Clinical Ethics
- Euthanasia
- Suicide/Assisted Suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Passive euthanasia