Article Text
Abstract
Introduction Most physicians are against active euthanasia. Very little is known about the possible changes in the attitudes of physicians.
Methods A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 1003 Finnish physicians of working age. A similar questionnaire had been sent to a random sample of Finnish physicians also in 1993 and 2003. The questionnaire consisted of statements about euthanasia, for which the participants were asked to express their agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale.
Results In general, Finnish physicians’ attitudes towards active euthanasia have become considerably more positive. In 2003, 61% of the respondents were against the legalisation of euthanasia and 29% supported it. In 2013, both groups were of equal size (46%). The willingness to perform active euthanasia has not, however, increased significantly, even in a legalised setting.
Conclusions The attitudes of Finnish physicians towards active euthanasia became considerably more positive between 2003 and 2013. There was no significant change, however, in the willingness to practice euthanasia if it became legal.
- Clinical Ethics
- Euthanasia
- Suicide/Assisted Suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians ’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Passive euthanasia
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw 's new perspective
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician - assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw 's new perspective on euthanasia
- Mr Marty ’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Framing euthanasia
- The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts / omissions distinction in euthanasia